Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Grand Tour

Since mostly everyone already knows what we've been up to lately I decided to try something a little different this year.  What follows are the full-size (non-cropped) images of our thoughtfully selected Christmas card photos.  I thought the story of them might tell the story of us a bit more thoroughly than would your standard Christmas letter. Enjoy!
Logan is coming up on halfway through his first year of Kindergarten (4K) and is a few weeks in to his amateur hockey career as a member of the Ice Wolves hockey team. I believe myself to be taking the transition in stride with the notable exception of the donning of hockey equipment. Each week, Logan sits cooperatively and the girls look on patiently as Mom wrestles with skates, pads, socks, and other bewildering hockey items, some of the names of which she doesn't know and others she just can't recall. Dad, of course, is elated to have an athlete in the family (and probably also to be at work on Saturday mornings while the skates are being laced and the helmet hammered into position.) Mostly the young rookies are still just learning how to maneuver on the ice, but Logan has improved tremendously in the past couple of weeks alone and we are very proud of his spirit and perseverance. 


As some of you may have guessed, I cheated a little with this one. It's actually from Danielle's wedding a couple of years ago. With so many small children biting our ankles, it's somewhat rare to find a picture of just the two of us together. I actually did manage to turn up one that was taken earlier this year, but I decided the background didn't fit in well enough with the other Christmas card photos, so I went with this one instead. My favorite thing about going back and digging up this picture after a couple of years is that I realized Baby Corinne is in it as well! This is August 13, 2010 and we were expecting, but didn't know it yet, so Zach's hand resting probably right on her is a complete coincidence <3

Our most recent family photo, taken September 2012.  We decided to do our photos early this year because my little daredevil Julianne had to have a tooth pulled in early October due to some trauma involving a fall from a chair. Ironically, she's not smiling a toothy smile in the photo and she looks equally adorable partially toothless anyway. If anyone keeps their old Christmas cards, you can probably go back through and see that we've worn red and black every year since the beginning of time. However, this year, for whatever reason (perhaps pregnancy hormones) I decided I was sick and tired of red, so we went with blues and browns (and a little purple) instead.

Corinne sporting her signature massive baby grin.  She just  loves to say cheese (often she even says it if you're holding something that looks remotely like, but is definitely not, a camera) and she holds out the 'ee' in cheese for as long as she possibly can which is why almost every picture of her looks exactly like this.


Our Preschool Ballerina Julianne. She chose the dance outfit all by herself and she just loves getting all prettied up for dance class. Her group will be performing Baby's First Christmas in the Highland Holiday Concert on the 20th. She is so excited and we can't wait to see all the little ones dancing with their baby dolls.  (Julianne's "baby" of choice is currently a stuffed seahorse, so I suppose we'll see that too.) So adorable. She has the best time with the other little girls and since she takes lessons up at the school, most of them are going to be in her pre-kindergarten class next year so she'll have some friends and a big brother around to get her off to a great start! 

We had some spring photos of the kids taken in May. They are so precious. I got a great deal on these right-after-Easter dresses. The girls were so excited about them. I always get Logan's picture taken in the same suit. Poor kid. He's growing so tall though that I think by next year I'm finally going to have to start shopping for a new one. 

This is a bonus photo :) I really wanted to get it on the card, but I just couldn't make it work. It's me with all four of my little ones. Logan has his left hand on the baby. The bears are just visiting.

A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM OUR HOUSE TO YOURS!
WE LOVE YOU ALL!

God Bless,
Zach, Andrea, Logan, 
Julianne, Corinne, and (coming soon) Baby Mason




Friday, November 30, 2012

Umbrella People

I've always had a problem with umbrellas. When I was a kid, I had this beautiful pink ruffly girly one that I loved - and hated.

I'm not sure at what point we, as a society, decided that it was acceptable to soak oneself to the bone daily in the shower or that it's perfectly logical to run through a sprinkler or lay half-naked in a giant pool of water on a hot summer day, but on that exact same type of day a person would have to be insane not to want a giant synthetic mushroom covering as much of him/her as possible should a few drops of water begin to fall from the sky.

But back to my pretty pink umbrella. Obviously I loved it for it's sheer beauty which is most likely why I tolerated it for so long, especially after the unfortunate day when I passed under a wily maple tree on my walk to school and a spider rudely and terrifyingly fell on top of it and I had to look at the horrid thing through the semi-transparent veil of my pretty though from that point on, somewhat permanently diminished, ruffly umbrella.
Beyond the unfortunate arachnid episode, I also hated that the umbrella pinched my poor delicate little girl fingers every time I tried to fold the darn thing down.  And, let's face it, once you have arrived, hopefully dry, at your desired location, then there's still a) the trying to hold the umbrella far enough from your body so you can shake the rainwater you've thus far worked so hard to keep away from you from spraying all over the (presumably nice) clothing that you've been trying to protect, and b) the trying to set the umbrella down in just such a way and in just such a location that it's likely to dry out before it's next use and it won't roll away down the church stairs.  (Make of it what you will, but for whatever reason the skies always seemed to open up just as I was making my way to the sanctuary. It even rained on the day of my wedding. I didn't use an umbrella then either.)
Although, in defense of my synthetic friends, you almost definitely needn't sweat the stair issue if your umbrellas are anything like most of the umbrellas at our house were and a good half of the sharp metal spokes have separated from the fabric, protruding dangerously out the sides and providing a comfortable level of insurance that your umbrella will not ever be rolling anywhere again. Of course the kind of insurance that umbrellas in this condition really should come with is additional health insurance to cover anyone who may be walking at eye level next to them, but my pretty pink umbrella was designed for children so it had convenient plastic spoke covers to avoid just these kinds of liabilities. I wasn't afforded the privilege of carrying one of the AFLAC-necessitating umbrellas until a good many years later when I was deemed responsible enough to put my friends eyes out with impugnity.

Finally, when I was in 11th grade, I participated in my high school production of Singin' in the Rain for which every ensemble member was required to purchase a specific brand of umbrella in a specified color. Somewhat to my dismay, I was assigned the yellow umbrella, a color that I didn't mind, but didn't love, and that I continue to be saddled with to this day. My best guess is that this bright yellow emcumbrance is currently located somewhere in the trunk of my car... or maybe my husband's car... or maybe the broom closet... or maybe... Well, the fact is that I haven't got a clue what became of it beyond that I am still in possession of it in some capacity because by the 11th grade I was for all intents and purposes and thoroughly and completely over and done with umbrellas. Actually, I should really consider looking through some of my old high school memoribilia to see if I can't find any photographs from that production because these would serve as the only official documentation of the last time I used (or probably even laid hands on) an umbrella. I no longer even stand beneath other people's umbrellas when they offer. There's almost always an awning or vehicle available in the general vicinity, and even when there isn't... well, it's just a matter of principle.

There are a great many undesirable personality traits and/or bad habits that we inadvertently pass on to our children. In fact, although my oldest child has only yesterday celebrated his fifth birthday, thus rendering the following declaration a really bad sign, just off the top of my head I can list a number of these - let's call them hereditary traits - that I have put upon my young ones to date, not the least of which is hardly ever wearing any kind of protective outerwear regardless of the weather. If you're thinking that statement can't be accurate due to the fact that you've often seen me clad in my husband's huge black wool peacoat, although it has been pretty darn cold out recently this phenomenon is scarcely weather-related.  Much more closely related than the elements is the fact that my eight plus months pregnant form refuses to squeeze into anything that either fits properly or looks half-decent; the peacoat being the perfect disguise (must be why they're so popular with detectives) as it covers both my belly and the top of my pants, sooo as long as my lower legs look somewhat stylish, BOOM, I become instantaneously socially acceptable. Now if I could only manage to get my hair styled in the morning...
Unfortunately, while leading by example is a respected and useful method of preschooler training, I don't model coat-wearing nearly often or consistently enough to even scratch the surface of the damage I've already done and thus my kids continue to feel, as I secretly (or perhaps now not-so-secretly) do, that unless you're planning to stand or sit out in the frigid elements for an elongated time period (a thing I seldom purposely do), it's much faster and more comfortable to leave these cumbersome bindings behind and just make a break for the nearest heated structure instead. Does this strategy have its pitfalls? Definitely. Have I been practicing it for a great many years with no fatalities to speak of? (sorry mom) Absolutely.

So you see how I use my insane twist on psychology to justify my dysfunctional and illogical behavior. As you know if you are a parent (or will likely learn soon enough if you are not one) everything you do and say to or in the vicinity of your children has unintended repercussions. Sometimes these are good. (For example, my little mom heart melts a lot every time I watch my children playing sweetly with their baby dolls or nurturing one another using language that is unmistakably mine.) And sometimes they're... well... just plain paranoid - like this:
A couple of weeks ago, I was dropping Julianne off at preschool during a torrential downpour when the mom of a little boy from Julianne's class offered us a spot under her umbrella. The distance between my car and the school was literally not more than 50 feet, thus activating my defensive umbrella-evading impulses and causing me to turn down her generous offer. (I should also add that we had almost traveled the distance between our car and hers when she made the offer; her car being parked a good 30 feet closer to the door then ours was.)  As we safely procured a nice dry post (shockingly, despite our rogue umbrellalessness, we didn't get that wet in the first place) inside the door (nice umbrella mom was still outside the door (which has no awning) shaking out and attempting to close the clearly indispensible tool that was her umbrella), Julianne finally thought to pose to me the age-old question of why we don't have an umbrella. My mind, as usual consumed with the idea of getting up the stairs and into the classroom less than half an hour late for once, I offhandedly responded, "We're just not umbrella people."
When I returned a bit under 3 hours later to retrieve her, the rain had still not ceased and umbrella-clad moms were gathering in droves at the door futilely attempting to shake off what was still coming down. While they spent their time engaged in this useful activity, I made my way up the stairs, picked up Julianne, and we emerged, hand-in-hand into the torrent on the heels of another little boy and his mom.  On our way out the door, we were temporarily delayed as the mom stopped to pick up her umbrella (to be fair, her vehicle was parked slightly  farther from the door than was the first mom's, though still not farther than my own) before heading off in the opposite direction. As they walked away, Julianne glanced several times back at them, pensively, suspiciously, before motioning for me to move my ear closer to her lips and nervously inquiring, "Mom... are they... ... umbrella people?"

Yes Dear. Beware. Beware the Umbrella People. They're Smart. They're Crafty. And They Like to be Dry.
If not for logic and the sensible application of physics, they would be Unstoppable.

This is not the pink ruffly umbrella with which I spent a relatively minor portion of my childhood.
If I ever do manage to turn up a picture of me actually holding mine I'll  definitely use it to replace this one.
Or I'll burn it.
One or the other.
Beware the Umbrella People

Monday, October 1, 2012

Snake Tales

After weathering the preschool experience for the first time with Logan last year, I find myself looking forward to certain predictable year-to-year events of Julianne's journey, the earliest of these (besides maybe that epic first day of school) being the introduction of the story of Adam and Eve (it's a Christian preschool.) The fact that this is one of the most commonly told and well known stories in the Bible and that my own children have heard it numerous times at home seems to have no effect whatsoever on the version they bring home from school. When I repeated Logan's version to one of his teachers last year, she explained that it's difficult, especially near the beginning of the school year, to get all of the children listening quietly at the same time, focusing on the story, and that there may be side conversations occurring simultaneously that could potentially intertwine with the pertinent details. That being said, I now proudly present...

The Book of Genesis According To:

Logan 9-21-2011
Logan: God told Adam and Eve not to eat anything from the tree, but then the snake came down and said (best hissing voice) "Eat The Cookie!" so they ate it and God was MAD!
Me: So did they get thrown out of the garden?
Logan: Nope. They stayed.

And if that version seems a little off to you, there's always this one...

Julianne 9-28-2012
Me: So what did you learn about today?
Julianne: Snakes.
Me: Did you learn about Adam and Eve and the snake?
Julianne: No, just the snake.
Me: Oh. What did the snake do?
Julianne: He just... squiggled up the tree, then strapped in and drove off!
Me: He drove off?!
Julianne: Yeah, in an apple tree car!
Me: Well what about Adam and Eve?
Julianne: They just made apple pie. (makes disgusted face) I don't like Adam and Eve's apple pie.

In today's struggling economy, it's always good to learn that your job is secure. Congrats to Sara Lee who should continue to be in business for a long, long time.


Julianne informs me that this is a picture of the snake driving off in his apple tree car. She became somewhat irate when Logan suggested that the snake was keeping his car in the tree, insisting that the entire tree was the car - a "tree. car."
No wonder God was so mad. 
Nobody listened to him and his favorite tree got stolen and he may or may not have lost a number of cookies all in the same day. 
And I'll bet he didn't even get any pie.
Sounds something like a day at the Washa house.
I'd be pretty darn mad about that too.





Saturday, April 14, 2012

Halloween in April

...not to be confused with Christmas in July.

How Rubber Duckies Celebrate Halloween

Logan's Ducks: You know what? We should dress up and go trick or treating!
Julianne's Ducks: Oh! Truck or Treating?
Logan's Ducks: No TRICK or treating.
Julianne's Ducks (disappointed): Oh, okay.
Logan's Ducks: So come on! Let's go to some houses.
Julianne's Ducks: Well...we're stuck in mud.



I'm told that the yellow ducks (Logan's Ducks) aren't wearing any costumes because at some point after they put them on but before the commencement of trick or treating, they inexplicably took them off again.
Also, one of Julianne's Ducks decided to dress (extremely convincingly, I might add) as a pink My Little Pony.
And neither Julianne nor her ducks ever did stop calling it Truck or Treating. No trucks were involved, but I guess if it sounds right you've just got to go with it - even if your big brother tells you it's wrong.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Procedurally Speaking


 Today's post includes, but is not limited to, portions of the awesome conversation between me and one of Wisconsin's finest Department of Revenue Tax "Experts" regarding a letter I received in the mail today informing me that the legitimacy of my three children as claimed on my state tax form is "being reviewed."

Me: One of the pieces of documentation on the list of requirements to verify the Child Tax Credit says that you need a statement from the school/daycare providers that each child attended from January 1 to December 31, 2011. Only one of my children is old enough to attend school and he was only in preschool for 3 months last year.
“Expert”: Okay...
Me: So do you still need the documentation? Even though only one of them was in school for only 3 months out of 12?
“Expert”: Yes.
Me: So... is it a requirement that the children need to be attending school in order to claim the Child Tax Credit?
“Expert”: No.
Me: Then why do you require a statement to prove that the child attended school?
“Expert”: I don't know. It's just part of the procedure I guess.

Me: Okay, well there are also a lot of other requirements on this list that don't even apply to me – there's proof of divorce and renting information – do I just skip over the parts that are irrelevant?
FYI: There are TEN rather detailed requirements listed in the letter, at least half of which are irrelevant to me.
“Expert”: Yes. We send everyone the same letter. Just ignore or write Not Applicable or something like that next to the ones that don't apply to you.
*Thanks for the personalized service, State Department of Revenue. So tell me, exactly how many potentially (though not bloody likely) illegitimate children ARE under “investigation” this year?

Best For Last:
Me: It says here that you want me to mail you the ORIGINAL birth certificates for all three of my children.
“Expert”: Yes, that's correct.
Me: Well, I'm very uncomfortable with that. The first thing anyone will tell you is that you should NEVER give up the original copies of your important documents. What happens if they get lost in between?
“Expert”: (long pause, a little too long perhaps, then) Well I guess we just have to trust the Post Office for that one. We'll send it back to you certified mail. If it makes you feel better you can send it to us certified as well, although it'll cost you more that way.
What I Should Have Said: So... you're concerned about ME spending a couple of extra dollars on certified shipping when it's costing HOW MANY TAXPAYER DOLLARS to return all of these apparently many many certificates that YOU are requesting?
What I Actually Said: ….. (not a thing, processing the insanity)
“Expert” steps in, says: … I don't know where Highland is, but... what is it near? We have offices all over. You could just bring it in.
Me: (would slap guy's forehead for him if he were closer; WHY did we just go through this ENTIRE postal service bit if there was a way available for me to hold on to the originals the WHOLE TIME?!) The address on the letter is Madison. That's the closest city to us. Is that where you are?
“Expert”: Yes. We're here Monday through Friday from... etc. etc.
*At least he knows when they're open.
Me: Well I'm pretty sure that the birth certificates were sent to me from the state to begin with. Why don't you have a way of just looking them up? Or why can't you at least accept photocopies since I'm sure you have all of the information there somewhere?
“Expert”: (following another unnecessarily lengthy pause) I don't know. That's just the procedure I guess.

One day, I'm going to sit down and create my own Procedure, which will require anyone wishing to include the word 'Revenue' in his/her job title to be able to provide me a succinct and logical explanation of the meaning and purpose of any and all government “procedures” relating to my specific situation. If he/she is unable to provide this explanation to my satisfaction, I reserve the right to stop paying taxes until such time as said employee is replaced with either a more knowledgeable employee or a well-trained monkey. (Wondering how the monkey could be at all useful in a telephone conversation? Frankly, so am I a little, but if the monkey doesn't speak English, so far I haven't found that to be a requirement for government employment regardless of species.)

And by the way, my PROCEDURE (oh yes, all caps, NOW it's official) will also require me to fill out and submit any and all tax forms in the following manner: by turning the form upside down and writing all letters and numbers on the correct lines, but backwards, so as to require a government “expert” to use an expert mirror to interpret my writing. And when they inevitably contact me to ask why on earth I would fill out my tax forms in such a confusing and illogical manner which is ultimately costing them a great deal in time and resources, not to mention giving them terrible migraines, I will, of course, reply:

“I don't know. That's just the procedure... I guess.”   

*On a related note, should you find Cereal Mom blog to be shut down indefinitely in the near future, this will most likely be the result of a lengthy and, of course, incredibly expensive government investigation into whether or not I may legally be allowed to continue to call my blog Cereal Mom given the fact that I a) may not actually BE a mom (photographs of me holding my children in the hospital and/or carrying them in my uterus are, clearly, considered to be unacceptable forms of identification and b) may - not - even - like - cereal  (*insert exaggerated gasp from the audience here*)
Stay tuned for the dramatic (and expensive - don't forget expensive) conclusion of the Cereal Mom Scandal in only 4-6 weeks... or is it 6-8 weeks... or maybe 6-10...

Stay tuned for the dramatic conclusion of the Cereal Mom Scandal whenever government gets around to it. Because, in accordance with procedure, while I have only 30 days to present them with multiple pages of documentation, they will reply to me at their earliest (or perhaps not so earliest) convenience. I guess.

As long as we're waiting, though, we might as well entertain ourselves with some unacceptable forms of documentation:


Illegitimate Ultrasound Photo with My Name On It
(if that is my real name)

Illegitimate Baby Belly Photo
(You can tell it's illegitimate by how terrified I look.)

Illegitimate Hospital Photo
(It's incredible how exhausting not delivering a baby can be.)



Illegitimate Christmas Card
(My most sincere apologies to anyone who may have
received one of these a few months ago.
The government and I were not aware at that time that these
children might not actually exist.)

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Love In Life


 My Kids Love To...

empty toy containers that have just been filled.

cry over spilled milk.

spend the better part of each day asking me to look up the Spanish translation for every English word they hear.

“help” me with the dishes... and the laundry... and the dusting... and the vacuuming...

sing and dance loudly - especially during naptime.

make something out of nothing (both artistically and figuratively).

smile and laugh and tell jokes – especially during church.

call their dad by his first name even though it drives him bananas.

call Grandma and Grandpa 10 to 15 times every weekend (and occasionally during the week) because Grandma and Grandpa won't admit that it probably drives them bananas.

fight and play together so often and so similarly that sometimes I mistakenly recite to them my well-rehearsed 'stop fighting and behave yourselves' speech for no reason, causing them all to stare at me as though I might be nuts for few seconds before resuming play.

smear mass quantities of food to the four corners of my freshly scrubbed table despite the fork and spoon they were each given for the express purpose of preventing this.

create a bookshelf avalanche every time they pick out a book, then attempt to remedy the situation by carefully replacing only that one book – incorrectly.

track mud and snow and the occasional creepy crawly critter into my as-well-maintained-as-can-be-expected house on a semi-daily basis.

Just a few examples of why a mom like me requires daily reminders that What I Love Most Is... To See Them Having Fun.




Logan made this rose for me out of Cheerios.
It's amazing how one Cheerio Rose can make up for at least twenty Bookshelf Avalanches.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Let The Sun Shine


 So today I'm having some groundhog issues...

Groundhog Issue #1: I just found out they have their own groundhog here - in Wisconsin. His name is Jimmy. This strikes me as an odd name for a groundhog, but I suppose it really isn't any more odd than Phil. At any rate, now I'm wondering if every state has its own groundhog and if so, the weather can't possibly be similar enough in every single state at the same time on the same day for fifty groundhogs to all see the same thing. So which groundhog's prediction is correct? Or will winter last longer in some states than it will in others? And doesn't spring officially start around March 21st regardless of what some crazy old guys in top hats think a groundhog sees?

Groundhog Issue #2: If the weather is sunny, the groundhog will see his shadow and there will be six more weeks of winter. If the weather is cloudy, he won't see it and then (drum roll please) there will be slightly less than seven more weeks of winter. Why all the fuss over six hypothetical extra days of spring?

Groundhog Issue #3: If we're assuming that sunny weather on February 2nd means six more weeks of winter and cloudy weather means less than six more weeks, then why do we need a groundhog at all?

Groundhog Issue #4: Since groundhog meteorology is pretty high on my list of pseudosciences, I think I'd really prefer a beautiful, sunny day on February 2nd over a gloomy, cloudy one. I feel comfortable taking my chances with the week of March 21st if I can have a nice, sunny winter day as a guarantee. Besides, according to the National Climatic Data Center, the overall groundhog weather prediction accuracy rate is only around 39% anyway. That's less than a 50/50 shot. Bring on the sun.

Groundhog Issue #4: Groundhogs don't write poetry.  I'm just saying...


Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Bananarama

Mo Willems began his career as a writer and illustrator for Sesame Street. Since then he's won widespread acclaim for television and, more recently, literature, possibly the most notable of his many accomplishments being inspiring my children to resume eating bananas.

I'd hardly say that everything Mo Willems pens is the gold standard for literature. For example, I see where he's going with the pigeon books, the kids enjoy them, and even for me, the pigeon has his moments, but overall I could live without seeing him for a day or two... or much, much longer.

Elephant and Piggie, on the other hand, have rapidly endeared themselves to the entire family to the extent that they are discussed on a daily basis, mainly as a result of this well-worded quote:

I have more to give!
More words! More jokes!
More “bananas!””

My kids used to literally eat bananas by the bunch, but then came the dark times: the Great Banana Boycott of 2010. Suddenly no one would even dare lay eyes upon this dreaded yellow menace and at least once a week banana bread was piled high at the Washa House, occupying valuable counter space that Mom was saving for other undesirable items such as excess lollipops and food processor attachments.

Now thanks to Elephant and Piggie, the kids are once again bananaholics and even little Baby Corinne has learned to request them by name. Well, by “nana” anyway. Whenever Logan or Julianne are in the mood for a tasty yellow treat, this is what I hear: “Mom, guess what snack I want? More words, more jokes, more bananas!” at which point I will inevitably look up to see a child gleefully waving a bunch of bananas overhead. Logan has even begun learning how to peel a banana for himself, although he's a bit perplexed by the whole pulling back the stem until it snaps and then tearing it open from the side business.

Julianne normally allows someone else to handle all of that complex peeling business for her, but one day when I was temporarily unavailable for banana peeling but still in the room, I was privileged to witness her own unique brand of banana peeling: She pulled each individual piece of peel (about 5 in total) cleanly free of the banana before ever taking a bite and as each piece pulled free she said, “Sorry, Sorry, Sorry, Sorry, Sorry.” Fruit gentility really is an undervalued art, but just for the sake of argument, I asked her why she was apologizing to the banana. Solemnly, she bowed her head and uttered pathetically the words, “I don't know.”

Big brother Logan on the other hand, in one fell swoop proudly whips the entire peel free of the banana, then looks me squarely in the eye and says, “But Mom, I don't want the whole banana.”

Knowing that Baby Corinne will gladly accept the leftovers, I say “That's fine, just eat as much as you want,” to which he angrily screws up his face, stomps his foot, and pouts, “I don't want as much as I want.”

Obviously.

Meanwhile, Julianne has finally completed the unnecessarily arduous task of peeling her banana and proceeds to tear the banana in half. She then gently places the two halves on the table, picks up a piece of peel from her intricately constructed modern banana peel art design, and asks me, “Can I just --- eat the banana?” (She always pauses right in the middle of a question, like she's trying to come up with the right word or something. I can't explain it. There are many things about Julianne that I can't explain.)

I tell her that she can eat the banana, but that what she is currently holding is not the banana, it's the peel. She says, “Okay,” and I foolishly consider the matter resolved and move on to my next task: removing large chunks of smushed banana from the baby's clothing, to be immediately followed by scraping dried bits of slightly older smushed banana from her clothing and face.

Almost immediately, I hear a distressed yell from Logan's side of the table and turn to see Julianne peacefully munching not the banana, but the piece of peel. Returning to what I can only think to refer to as her Banana Station, I point out the actual banana, now decoratively draped in what remains of the pile of banana peels.

Angrily she shoves the banana halves aside yelling, “No! Those are peels. Those are no good!”, then, point made, resumes chomping away at the peel. So the peels are bananas and the bananas are peels. Nothing confusing about that. Technically I'm pretty sure it's safe and maybe even healthy to eat the peels, but for whatever reason, I can't just sit idly by and watch her do it. So I take the path of least resistence and remove the peels. (Technically, I suppose this is more like the path of slightly more resistence than just letting her eat the peels, but less than leaving the peels in front of her and spending half the day arguing about why they're inedible). Without another word, she double fists the banana pieces (the actual bananas, not to be confused with the peels that were previously posing as bananas) and devours every last bite.

Logan also finishes his banana in its entirety. I guess now we know how much he wanted... or didn't want... or something.

By this time, Julianne has wandered off in the direction of the living room, but about 5 minutes later, having “napped” on the couch, she strolls back into the kitchen asking if she can have a banana. I tell her that she could, but for the fact that she and Logan have just eaten the last two bananas. You can imagine that hearing the news that there are no more bananas does not go over especially well. Indignantly she responds, “Yes there are more bananas.” When I ask her where they are, she can't tell me, but there are definitely more bananas somewhere.

Within a few minutes, having finally come to terms with the disappointing banana shortage, she pouts, says, “Logan ate mine!” and storms out of the room.

Logan didn't eat hers. Just for the record.

Book Mania

I have a theory (you'll hear me say this often, usually immediately proceeding something insanely asinine, but no matter) that beyond basic necessary survival instincts, there are a few


other universal character traits that are common to all babies from birth:

  1. The ability to love and the desire to be loved.
  2. Rhythm. I haven't met a baby yet who didn't love a good tune. Any kind of tune. Babies aren't nearly as discriminatory about music genres as us crotchety older folks are. And babies can rock in rhythm to anything. The faster the music plays, the faster the baby rocks. Sometimes mine rock so hard they tip over, but that helps them learn to crawl – and is entirely irrelevant.
  3. Book Mania.
Long preceding the formation of so many of my own largely unfounded and significantly under-researched theories, young Cereal Mom, as a college Psychology major, was made privy to the often questionably founded, significantly over-researched theories of many long-winded Psychologists who came before me. One such theory that crossed my desk during this particular portion of my edification was the theory that heredity may predispose a person to alcoholism. I may have a theory of my own regarding this theory, but fortunately that theory would, of course, be significantly under-researched and completely beside the point - Said point being that, according to Book Mania Theory (oh yes, I used caps; now it's official) universal heredity with regard to the formation of character traits predisposes all children to the development of book mania.

Symptoms of early stage book mania may include, but are not limited to:
  • an unceasing desire to eat, flip the pages of, and/or stare intently at the pictures in books, magazines, or other printed materials for hours on end
  • requesting repeated readings of a favorite or new or conveniently located piece of reading material from a parent, guardian, or random person who may be unknown to the child but who bears even the vaguest resemblance to someone who is known to be literate
  • attributing human characteristics to books; for example, a child may feel the desire to be close to his or her books even while he or she is asleep, watching television, eating, or otherwise engaged (i.e. in the bathroom); he or she may also feel a sense of loss when an unexpected separation from a beloved book occurs such as when a book has been so beloved that it has basically been rebound in some combination of super glue, masking, packing, and scotch tape, until one day it inexplicably disappears leaving a helpless mom with not a clue as to its possible whereabouts.... I said Mom has no idea where it could have gone... She's looked everywhere and yet the book is nowhere to be found... Can we just drop it already?... Oh what's that? No one said anything? Well, nevermind then. Moving on.
The most popular treatment for book mania is parental apathy, but treatment is not recommended and may be detrimental to a child's future well-being.

My children have all had extremely advanced cases of book mania for as long as I can remember. Baby Corinne is still in Stage 1: The book as geometric chew toy, but we expect somewhat rapid advancement within the next 2-3 years. Logan and Julianne give no indication of entering Stage 5: Recognizing relatively poor literature, anytime soon, but they can also tell the gold from the graphite, so to speak.