Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Friday, November 30, 2012
Umbrella People
I've always had a problem with umbrellas. When I was a kid, I had this beautiful pink ruffly girly one that I loved - and hated.
I'm not sure at what point we, as a society, decided that it was acceptable to soak oneself to the bone daily in the shower or that it's perfectly logical to run through a sprinkler or lay half-naked in a giant pool of water on a hot summer day, but on that exact same type of day a person would have to be insane not to want a giant synthetic mushroom covering as much of him/her as possible should a few drops of water begin to fall from the sky.
But back to my pretty pink umbrella. Obviously I loved it for it's sheer beauty which is most likely why I tolerated it for so long, especially after the unfortunate day when I passed under a wily maple tree on my walk to school and a spider rudely and terrifyingly fell on top of it and I had to look at the horrid thing through the semi-transparent veil of my pretty though from that point on, somewhat permanently diminished, ruffly umbrella.
Beyond the unfortunate arachnid episode, I also hated that the umbrella pinched my poor delicate little girl fingers every time I tried to fold the darn thing down. And, let's face it, once you have arrived, hopefully dry, at your desired location, then there's still a) the trying to hold the umbrella far enough from your body so you can shake the rainwater you've thus far worked so hard to keep away from you from spraying all over the (presumably nice) clothing that you've been trying to protect, and b) the trying to set the umbrella down in just such a way and in just such a location that it's likely to dry out before it's next use and it won't roll away down the church stairs. (Make of it what you will, but for whatever reason the skies always seemed to open up just as I was making my way to the sanctuary. It even rained on the day of my wedding. I didn't use an umbrella then either.)
Although, in defense of my synthetic friends, you almost definitely needn't sweat the stair issue if your umbrellas are anything like most of the umbrellas at our house were and a good half of the sharp metal spokes have separated from the fabric, protruding dangerously out the sides and providing a comfortable level of insurance that your umbrella will not ever be rolling anywhere again. Of course the kind of insurance that umbrellas in this condition really should come with is additional health insurance to cover anyone who may be walking at eye level next to them, but my pretty pink umbrella was designed for children so it had convenient plastic spoke covers to avoid just these kinds of liabilities. I wasn't afforded the privilege of carrying one of the AFLAC-necessitating umbrellas until a good many years later when I was deemed responsible enough to put my friends eyes out with impugnity.
Finally, when I was in 11th grade, I participated in my high school production of Singin' in the Rain for which every ensemble member was required to purchase a specific brand of umbrella in a specified color. Somewhat to my dismay, I was assigned the yellow umbrella, a color that I didn't mind, but didn't love, and that I continue to be saddled with to this day. My best guess is that this bright yellow emcumbrance is currently located somewhere in the trunk of my car... or maybe my husband's car... or maybe the broom closet... or maybe... Well, the fact is that I haven't got a clue what became of it beyond that I am still in possession of it in some capacity because by the 11th grade I was for all intents and purposes and thoroughly and completely over and done with umbrellas. Actually, I should really consider looking through some of my old high school memoribilia to see if I can't find any photographs from that production because these would serve as the only official documentation of the last time I used (or probably even laid hands on) an umbrella. I no longer even stand beneath other people's umbrellas when they offer. There's almost always an awning or vehicle available in the general vicinity, and even when there isn't... well, it's just a matter of principle.
There are a great many undesirable personality traits and/or bad habits that we inadvertently pass on to our children. In fact, although my oldest child has only yesterday celebrated his fifth birthday, thus rendering the following declaration a really bad sign, just off the top of my head I can list a number of these - let's call them hereditary traits - that I have put upon my young ones to date, not the least of which is hardly ever wearing any kind of protective outerwear regardless of the weather. If you're thinking that statement can't be accurate due to the fact that you've often seen me clad in my husband's huge black wool peacoat, although it has been pretty darn cold out recently this phenomenon is scarcely weather-related. Much more closely related than the elements is the fact that my eight plus months pregnant form refuses to squeeze into anything that either fits properly or looks half-decent; the peacoat being the perfect disguise (must be why they're so popular with detectives) as it covers both my belly and the top of my pants, sooo as long as my lower legs look somewhat stylish, BOOM, I become instantaneously socially acceptable. Now if I could only manage to get my hair styled in the morning...
Unfortunately, while leading by example is a respected and useful method of preschooler training, I don't model coat-wearing nearly often or consistently enough to even scratch the surface of the damage I've already done and thus my kids continue to feel, as I secretly (or perhaps now not-so-secretly) do, that unless you're planning to stand or sit out in the frigid elements for an elongated time period (a thing I seldom purposely do), it's much faster and more comfortable to leave these cumbersome bindings behind and just make a break for the nearest heated structure instead. Does this strategy have its pitfalls? Definitely. Have I been practicing it for a great many years with no fatalities to speak of? (sorry mom) Absolutely.
So you see how I use my insane twist on psychology to justify my dysfunctional and illogical behavior. As you know if you are a parent (or will likely learn soon enough if you are not one) everything you do and say to or in the vicinity of your children has unintended repercussions. Sometimes these are good. (For example, my little mom heart melts a lot every time I watch my children playing sweetly with their baby dolls or nurturing one another using language that is unmistakably mine.) And sometimes they're... well... just plain paranoid - like this:
A couple of weeks ago, I was dropping Julianne off at preschool during a torrential downpour when the mom of a little boy from Julianne's class offered us a spot under her umbrella. The distance between my car and the school was literally not more than 50 feet, thus activating my defensive umbrella-evading impulses and causing me to turn down her generous offer. (I should also add that we had almost traveled the distance between our car and hers when she made the offer; her car being parked a good 30 feet closer to the door then ours was.) As we safely procured a nice dry post (shockingly, despite our rogue umbrellalessness, we didn't get that wet in the first place) inside the door (nice umbrella mom was still outside the door (which has no awning) shaking out and attempting to close the clearly indispensible tool that was her umbrella), Julianne finally thought to pose to me the age-old question of why we don't have an umbrella. My mind, as usual consumed with the idea of getting up the stairs and into the classroom less than half an hour late for once, I offhandedly responded, "We're just not umbrella people."
When I returned a bit under 3 hours later to retrieve her, the rain had still not ceased and umbrella-clad moms were gathering in droves at the door futilely attempting to shake off what was still coming down. While they spent their time engaged in this useful activity, I made my way up the stairs, picked up Julianne, and we emerged, hand-in-hand into the torrent on the heels of another little boy and his mom. On our way out the door, we were temporarily delayed as the mom stopped to pick up her umbrella (to be fair, her vehicle was parked slightly farther from the door than was the first mom's, though still not farther than my own) before heading off in the opposite direction. As they walked away, Julianne glanced several times back at them, pensively, suspiciously, before motioning for me to move my ear closer to her lips and nervously inquiring, "Mom... are they... ... umbrella people?"
Yes Dear. Beware. Beware the Umbrella People. They're Smart. They're Crafty. And They Like to be Dry.
If not for logic and the sensible application of physics, they would be Unstoppable.
I'm not sure at what point we, as a society, decided that it was acceptable to soak oneself to the bone daily in the shower or that it's perfectly logical to run through a sprinkler or lay half-naked in a giant pool of water on a hot summer day, but on that exact same type of day a person would have to be insane not to want a giant synthetic mushroom covering as much of him/her as possible should a few drops of water begin to fall from the sky.
But back to my pretty pink umbrella. Obviously I loved it for it's sheer beauty which is most likely why I tolerated it for so long, especially after the unfortunate day when I passed under a wily maple tree on my walk to school and a spider rudely and terrifyingly fell on top of it and I had to look at the horrid thing through the semi-transparent veil of my pretty though from that point on, somewhat permanently diminished, ruffly umbrella.
Beyond the unfortunate arachnid episode, I also hated that the umbrella pinched my poor delicate little girl fingers every time I tried to fold the darn thing down. And, let's face it, once you have arrived, hopefully dry, at your desired location, then there's still a) the trying to hold the umbrella far enough from your body so you can shake the rainwater you've thus far worked so hard to keep away from you from spraying all over the (presumably nice) clothing that you've been trying to protect, and b) the trying to set the umbrella down in just such a way and in just such a location that it's likely to dry out before it's next use and it won't roll away down the church stairs. (Make of it what you will, but for whatever reason the skies always seemed to open up just as I was making my way to the sanctuary. It even rained on the day of my wedding. I didn't use an umbrella then either.)
Although, in defense of my synthetic friends, you almost definitely needn't sweat the stair issue if your umbrellas are anything like most of the umbrellas at our house were and a good half of the sharp metal spokes have separated from the fabric, protruding dangerously out the sides and providing a comfortable level of insurance that your umbrella will not ever be rolling anywhere again. Of course the kind of insurance that umbrellas in this condition really should come with is additional health insurance to cover anyone who may be walking at eye level next to them, but my pretty pink umbrella was designed for children so it had convenient plastic spoke covers to avoid just these kinds of liabilities. I wasn't afforded the privilege of carrying one of the AFLAC-necessitating umbrellas until a good many years later when I was deemed responsible enough to put my friends eyes out with impugnity.
Finally, when I was in 11th grade, I participated in my high school production of Singin' in the Rain for which every ensemble member was required to purchase a specific brand of umbrella in a specified color. Somewhat to my dismay, I was assigned the yellow umbrella, a color that I didn't mind, but didn't love, and that I continue to be saddled with to this day. My best guess is that this bright yellow emcumbrance is currently located somewhere in the trunk of my car... or maybe my husband's car... or maybe the broom closet... or maybe... Well, the fact is that I haven't got a clue what became of it beyond that I am still in possession of it in some capacity because by the 11th grade I was for all intents and purposes and thoroughly and completely over and done with umbrellas. Actually, I should really consider looking through some of my old high school memoribilia to see if I can't find any photographs from that production because these would serve as the only official documentation of the last time I used (or probably even laid hands on) an umbrella. I no longer even stand beneath other people's umbrellas when they offer. There's almost always an awning or vehicle available in the general vicinity, and even when there isn't... well, it's just a matter of principle.
There are a great many undesirable personality traits and/or bad habits that we inadvertently pass on to our children. In fact, although my oldest child has only yesterday celebrated his fifth birthday, thus rendering the following declaration a really bad sign, just off the top of my head I can list a number of these - let's call them hereditary traits - that I have put upon my young ones to date, not the least of which is hardly ever wearing any kind of protective outerwear regardless of the weather. If you're thinking that statement can't be accurate due to the fact that you've often seen me clad in my husband's huge black wool peacoat, although it has been pretty darn cold out recently this phenomenon is scarcely weather-related. Much more closely related than the elements is the fact that my eight plus months pregnant form refuses to squeeze into anything that either fits properly or looks half-decent; the peacoat being the perfect disguise (must be why they're so popular with detectives) as it covers both my belly and the top of my pants, sooo as long as my lower legs look somewhat stylish, BOOM, I become instantaneously socially acceptable. Now if I could only manage to get my hair styled in the morning...
Unfortunately, while leading by example is a respected and useful method of preschooler training, I don't model coat-wearing nearly often or consistently enough to even scratch the surface of the damage I've already done and thus my kids continue to feel, as I secretly (or perhaps now not-so-secretly) do, that unless you're planning to stand or sit out in the frigid elements for an elongated time period (a thing I seldom purposely do), it's much faster and more comfortable to leave these cumbersome bindings behind and just make a break for the nearest heated structure instead. Does this strategy have its pitfalls? Definitely. Have I been practicing it for a great many years with no fatalities to speak of? (sorry mom) Absolutely.
So you see how I use my insane twist on psychology to justify my dysfunctional and illogical behavior. As you know if you are a parent (or will likely learn soon enough if you are not one) everything you do and say to or in the vicinity of your children has unintended repercussions. Sometimes these are good. (For example, my little mom heart melts a lot every time I watch my children playing sweetly with their baby dolls or nurturing one another using language that is unmistakably mine.) And sometimes they're... well... just plain paranoid - like this:
A couple of weeks ago, I was dropping Julianne off at preschool during a torrential downpour when the mom of a little boy from Julianne's class offered us a spot under her umbrella. The distance between my car and the school was literally not more than 50 feet, thus activating my defensive umbrella-evading impulses and causing me to turn down her generous offer. (I should also add that we had almost traveled the distance between our car and hers when she made the offer; her car being parked a good 30 feet closer to the door then ours was.) As we safely procured a nice dry post (shockingly, despite our rogue umbrellalessness, we didn't get that wet in the first place) inside the door (nice umbrella mom was still outside the door (which has no awning) shaking out and attempting to close the clearly indispensible tool that was her umbrella), Julianne finally thought to pose to me the age-old question of why we don't have an umbrella. My mind, as usual consumed with the idea of getting up the stairs and into the classroom less than half an hour late for once, I offhandedly responded, "We're just not umbrella people."
When I returned a bit under 3 hours later to retrieve her, the rain had still not ceased and umbrella-clad moms were gathering in droves at the door futilely attempting to shake off what was still coming down. While they spent their time engaged in this useful activity, I made my way up the stairs, picked up Julianne, and we emerged, hand-in-hand into the torrent on the heels of another little boy and his mom. On our way out the door, we were temporarily delayed as the mom stopped to pick up her umbrella (to be fair, her vehicle was parked slightly farther from the door than was the first mom's, though still not farther than my own) before heading off in the opposite direction. As they walked away, Julianne glanced several times back at them, pensively, suspiciously, before motioning for me to move my ear closer to her lips and nervously inquiring, "Mom... are they... ... umbrella people?"
Yes Dear. Beware. Beware the Umbrella People. They're Smart. They're Crafty. And They Like to be Dry.
If not for logic and the sensible application of physics, they would be Unstoppable.
Monday, October 1, 2012
Snake Tales
After weathering the preschool experience for the first time with Logan last year, I find myself looking forward to certain predictable year-to-year events of Julianne's journey, the earliest of these (besides maybe that epic first day of school) being the introduction of the story of Adam and Eve (it's a Christian preschool.) The fact that this is one of the most commonly told and well known stories in the Bible and that my own children have heard it numerous times at home seems to have no effect whatsoever on the version they bring home from school. When I repeated Logan's version to one of his teachers last year, she explained that it's difficult, especially near the beginning of the school year, to get all of the children listening quietly at the same time, focusing on the story, and that there may be side conversations occurring simultaneously that could potentially intertwine with the pertinent details. That being said, I now proudly present...
The Book of Genesis According To:
Logan 9-21-2011
Logan: God told Adam and Eve not to eat anything from the tree, but then the snake came down and said (best hissing voice) "Eat The Cookie!" so they ate it and God was MAD!
Me: So did they get thrown out of the garden?
Logan: Nope. They stayed.
And if that version seems a little off to you, there's always this one...
Julianne 9-28-2012
Me: So what did you learn about today?
Julianne: Snakes.
Me: Did you learn about Adam and Eve and the snake?
Julianne: No, just the snake.
Me: Oh. What did the snake do?
Julianne: He just... squiggled up the tree, then strapped in and drove off!
Me: He drove off?!
Julianne: Yeah, in an apple tree car!
Me: Well what about Adam and Eve?
Julianne: They just made apple pie. (makes disgusted face) I don't like Adam and Eve's apple pie.
In today's struggling economy, it's always good to learn that your job is secure. Congrats to Sara Lee who should continue to be in business for a long, long time.
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Halloween in April
...not to be confused with Christmas in July.
How Rubber Duckies Celebrate Halloween
Logan's Ducks: You know what? We should dress up and go trick or treating!
Julianne's Ducks: Oh! Truck or Treating?
Logan's Ducks: No TRICK or treating.
Julianne's Ducks (disappointed): Oh, okay.
Logan's Ducks: So come on! Let's go to some houses.
Julianne's Ducks: Well...we're stuck in mud.
Julianne's Ducks: Oh! Truck or Treating?
Logan's Ducks: No TRICK or treating.
Julianne's Ducks (disappointed): Oh, okay.
Logan's Ducks: So come on! Let's go to some houses.
Julianne's Ducks: Well...we're stuck in mud.
I'm told that the yellow ducks (Logan's Ducks) aren't wearing any costumes because at some point after they put them on but before the commencement of trick or treating, they inexplicably took them off again.
Also, one of Julianne's Ducks decided to dress (extremely convincingly, I might add) as a pink My Little Pony.
And neither Julianne nor her ducks ever did stop calling it Truck or Treating. No trucks were involved, but I guess if it sounds right you've just got to go with it - even if your big brother tells you it's wrong.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Procedurally Speaking
Today's post includes, but is not limited to, portions of the awesome conversation between me and one of
Wisconsin's finest Department of Revenue Tax "Experts"
regarding a letter I received in the mail today informing me that the
legitimacy of my three children as claimed on my state tax form is
"being reviewed."
Me: One of the pieces of documentation on the list of requirements to
verify the Child Tax Credit says that you need a statement from the
school/daycare providers that each child attended from January 1 to
December 31, 2011. Only one of my children is old enough to attend
school and he was only in preschool for 3 months last year.
“Expert”: Okay...
Me: So do you still need the documentation? Even though only one of
them was in school for only 3 months out of 12?
“Expert”: Yes.
Me: So... is it a requirement that the children need to be attending
school in order to claim the Child Tax Credit?
“Expert”: No.
Me: Then why do you require a statement to prove that the child
attended school?
“Expert”: I don't know. It's just part of the procedure I guess.
Me: Okay, well there are also a lot of other requirements on this
list that don't even apply to me – there's proof of divorce and
renting information – do I just skip over the parts that are
irrelevant?
FYI: There are TEN rather detailed requirements listed in the letter,
at least half of which are irrelevant to me.
“Expert”: Yes. We send everyone the same letter. Just ignore or
write Not Applicable or something like that next to the ones that
don't apply to you.
*Thanks for the personalized service, State Department of Revenue. So
tell me, exactly how many potentially (though not bloody likely)
illegitimate children ARE under “investigation” this year?
Best For Last:
Me: It says here that you want me to mail you the ORIGINAL birth
certificates for all three of my children.
“Expert”: Yes, that's correct.
Me: Well, I'm very uncomfortable with that. The first thing anyone
will tell you is that you should NEVER give up the original copies of
your important documents. What happens if they get lost in between?
“Expert”: (long pause, a little too long perhaps, then) Well I
guess we just have to trust the Post Office for that one. We'll send
it back to you certified mail. If it makes you feel better you can
send it to us certified as well, although it'll cost you more that
way.
What I Should Have Said: So... you're concerned about ME spending a
couple of extra dollars on certified shipping when it's costing HOW
MANY TAXPAYER DOLLARS to return all of these apparently many many
certificates that YOU are requesting?
What I Actually Said: ….. (not a thing, processing the insanity)
“Expert” steps in, says: … I don't know where Highland is,
but... what is it near? We have offices all over. You could just
bring it in.
Me: (would slap guy's forehead for him if he were closer; WHY did we
just go through this ENTIRE postal service bit if there was a way
available for me to hold on to the originals the WHOLE TIME?!) The
address on the letter is Madison. That's the closest city to us. Is
that where you are?
“Expert”: Yes. We're here Monday through Friday from... etc. etc.
*At least he knows when they're open.
Me: Well I'm pretty sure that the birth certificates were sent to me
from the state to begin with. Why don't you have a way of just
looking them up? Or why can't you at least accept photocopies since
I'm sure you have all of the information there somewhere?
“Expert”: (following another unnecessarily lengthy pause) I don't know. That's
just the procedure I guess.
One day, I'm going to sit down and create my own Procedure, which
will require anyone wishing to include the word 'Revenue' in his/her
job title to be able to provide me a succinct and logical explanation
of the meaning and purpose of any and all government “procedures”
relating to my specific situation. If he/she is unable to provide
this explanation to my satisfaction, I reserve the right to stop
paying taxes until such time as said employee is replaced with either
a more knowledgeable employee or a well-trained monkey. (Wondering
how the monkey could be at all useful in a telephone conversation?
Frankly, so am I a little, but if the monkey doesn't speak English, so far I
haven't found that to be a requirement for government employment
regardless of species.)
And by the way, my PROCEDURE (oh yes, all caps, NOW it's official)
will also require me to fill out and submit any and all tax forms in
the following manner: by turning the form upside down and writing all
letters and numbers on the correct lines, but backwards, so as to
require a government “expert” to use an expert mirror to
interpret my writing. And when they inevitably contact me to ask why
on earth I would fill out my tax forms in such a confusing and
illogical manner which is ultimately costing them a great deal in time and
resources, not to mention giving them terrible migraines, I will, of
course, reply:
“I don't know. That's just the procedure... I guess.”
*On a related note, should you find Cereal Mom blog to be shut down indefinitely in the near future, this will most likely be the result of a lengthy and, of course, incredibly expensive government investigation into whether or not I may legally be allowed to continue to call my blog Cereal Mom given the fact that I a) may not actually BE a mom (photographs of me holding my children in the hospital and/or carrying them in my uterus are, clearly, considered to be unacceptable forms of identification and b) may - not - even - like - cereal (*insert exaggerated gasp from the audience here*)
Stay tuned for the dramatic (and expensive - don't forget expensive) conclusion of the Cereal Mom Scandal in only 4-6 weeks... or is it 6-8 weeks... or maybe 6-10...
Stay tuned for the dramatic conclusion of the Cereal Mom Scandal whenever government gets around to it. Because, in accordance with procedure, while I have only 30 days to present them with multiple pages of documentation, they will reply to me at their earliest (or perhaps not so earliest) convenience. I guess.
As long as we're waiting, though, we might as well entertain ourselves with some unacceptable forms of documentation:
Illegitimate Ultrasound Photo with My Name On It (if that is my real name) |
Illegitimate Baby Belly Photo (You can tell it's illegitimate by how terrified I look.) |
Illegitimate Hospital Photo (It's incredible how exhausting not delivering a baby can be.) |
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Love In Life
My Kids Love To...
empty toy containers that have just been filled.
cry over spilled milk.
spend the better part of each day asking me to look up the Spanish
translation for every English word they hear.
“help” me with the dishes... and the laundry... and the
dusting... and the vacuuming...
sing and dance loudly - especially during naptime.
make something out of nothing (both artistically and figuratively).
smile and laugh and tell jokes – especially during church.
call their dad by his first name even though it drives him bananas.
call Grandma and Grandpa 10 to 15 times every weekend (and
occasionally during the week) because Grandma and Grandpa won't admit
that it probably drives them bananas.
fight and play together so often and so similarly that sometimes I
mistakenly recite to them my well-rehearsed 'stop fighting and behave
yourselves' speech for no reason, causing them all to stare at me as
though I might be nuts for few seconds before resuming play.
smear mass quantities of food to the four corners of my freshly
scrubbed table despite the fork and spoon they were each given for
the express purpose of preventing this.
create a bookshelf avalanche every time they pick out a book, then
attempt to remedy the situation by carefully replacing only
that one book – incorrectly.
track mud and snow and the occasional creepy crawly critter into my
as-well-maintained-as-can-be-expected house on a semi-daily basis.
Just a few examples of why a mom like me requires daily reminders that
What I Love Most Is... To See Them Having Fun.
Logan made this rose for me out of Cheerios.
It's amazing how one Cheerio Rose can make up for at least twenty Bookshelf Avalanches.
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Let The Sun Shine
So today I'm having some groundhog issues...
Groundhog Issue #1: I just found out they have their own groundhog
here - in Wisconsin. His name is Jimmy. This strikes me as an odd
name for a groundhog, but I suppose it really isn't any more odd than
Phil. At any rate, now I'm wondering if every state has its own
groundhog and if so, the weather can't possibly be similar enough in
every single state at the same time on the same day for fifty
groundhogs to all see the same thing. So which groundhog's
prediction is correct? Or will winter last longer in some states
than it will in others? And doesn't spring officially start around
March 21st regardless of what some crazy old guys in top
hats think a groundhog sees?
Groundhog
Issue #2: If the weather is sunny, the groundhog will
see his shadow and there will be six more weeks of winter. If the
weather is cloudy, he won't see it and then (drum roll please) there will be slightly
less than seven more weeks of winter. Why all the fuss over six
hypothetical extra days of spring?
Groundhog Issue #3: If we're assuming that sunny weather on February
2nd means six more weeks of winter and cloudy weather means less than
six more weeks, then why do we need a groundhog at all?
Groundhog Issue #4: Since groundhog meteorology is pretty high on my
list of pseudosciences, I think I'd really prefer a beautiful, sunny
day on February 2nd over a gloomy, cloudy one. I feel
comfortable taking my chances with the week of March 21st
if I can have a nice, sunny winter day as a guarantee. Besides,
according to the National Climatic Data Center, the overall groundhog
weather prediction accuracy rate is only around 39% anyway. That's
less than a 50/50 shot. Bring on the sun.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Bananarama
Mo Willems began his career as a writer and illustrator
for Sesame Street. Since then he's won widespread acclaim for
television and, more recently, literature, possibly the most notable
of his many accomplishments being inspiring my children to resume
eating bananas.
More “bananas!””
I'd hardly say
that everything Mo Willems pens is the gold standard for literature.
For example, I see where he's going with the pigeon books, the kids
enjoy them, and even for me, the pigeon has his moments, but overall
I could live without seeing him for a day or two... or much, much
longer.
Elephant and
Piggie, on the other hand, have rapidly endeared themselves to the
entire family to the extent that they are discussed on a daily basis,
mainly as a result of this well-worded quote:
“I have more to give!
More words! More jokes!More “bananas!””
My kids used to literally eat bananas by the bunch, but then came the
dark times: the Great Banana Boycott of 2010. Suddenly no one would
even dare lay eyes upon this dreaded yellow menace and at least once
a week banana bread was piled high at the Washa House, occupying
valuable counter space that Mom was saving for other undesirable
items such as excess lollipops and food processor attachments.
Now
thanks to Elephant and Piggie, the kids are once again bananaholics
and even little Baby Corinne has learned to request them by name.
Well, by “nana” anyway. Whenever Logan or Julianne are in the
mood for a tasty yellow treat, this is what I hear: “Mom, guess
what snack I want? More words, more jokes, more
bananas!”
at which point I will inevitably look up to see a child gleefully
waving a bunch of bananas overhead. Logan has even begun learning
how to peel a banana for himself, although he's a bit perplexed by
the whole pulling back the stem until it snaps and then tearing it
open from the side business.
Julianne normally allows someone else to handle all of that complex
peeling business for her, but one day when I was temporarily
unavailable for banana peeling but still in the room, I was
privileged to witness her own unique brand of banana peeling: She
pulled each individual piece of peel (about 5 in total) cleanly free
of the banana before ever taking a bite and as each piece pulled free
she said, “Sorry, Sorry, Sorry, Sorry, Sorry.” Fruit gentility
really is an undervalued art, but just for the sake of argument, I
asked her why she was apologizing to the banana. Solemnly, she bowed
her head and uttered pathetically the words, “I don't know.”
Big
brother Logan on the other hand, in one fell swoop proudly whips the
entire peel free of the banana, then looks me squarely in the eye and
says, “But Mom, I don't want the whole
banana.”
Knowing
that Baby Corinne will gladly accept the leftovers, I say “That's
fine, just eat as much as you want,” to which he angrily screws up
his face, stomps his foot, and pouts, “I don't want
as much as I want.”
Obviously.
Meanwhile,
Julianne has finally completed the unnecessarily arduous task of
peeling her banana and proceeds to tear the banana in half. She then
gently places the two halves on the table, picks up a piece of peel
from her intricately constructed modern banana peel art design, and
asks me, “Can I just --- eat
the banana?” (She always pauses right in the middle of a question,
like she's trying to come up with the right word or something. I
can't explain it. There are many things about Julianne that I can't
explain.)
I tell her that she can eat the banana, but that what she is
currently holding is not the banana, it's the peel. She says, “Okay,”
and I foolishly consider the matter resolved and move on to my next
task: removing large chunks of smushed banana from the baby's
clothing, to be immediately followed by scraping dried bits of
slightly older smushed banana from her clothing and face.
Almost immediately, I hear a distressed yell from Logan's side of the
table and turn to see Julianne peacefully munching not the banana,
but the piece of peel. Returning to what I can only think to refer
to as her Banana Station, I point out the actual banana, now
decoratively draped in what remains of the pile of banana peels.
Angrily she shoves the banana halves aside yelling, “No! Those are
peels. Those are no good!”, then, point made, resumes chomping
away at the peel. So the peels are bananas and the bananas are
peels. Nothing confusing about that. Technically I'm pretty sure
it's safe and maybe even healthy to eat the peels, but for whatever
reason, I can't just sit idly by and watch her do it. So I take the
path of least resistence and remove the peels.
(Technically, I suppose this is more like the path of slightly more
resistence than just letting her eat the peels, but less than leaving
the peels in front of her and spending half the day arguing about why
they're inedible). Without another word, she double fists the banana
pieces (the actual bananas, not to be confused with the peels that
were previously posing as bananas) and devours every last bite.
Logan also finishes his banana in its entirety. I guess now we know
how much he wanted... or didn't want... or something.
By
this time, Julianne has wandered off in the direction of the living
room, but about 5 minutes later, having “napped” on the couch,
she strolls back into the kitchen asking if she can have a banana. I
tell her that she could, but for the fact that she and Logan have
just eaten the last two bananas. You can imagine that hearing the
news that there are no more bananas does not go over especially well.
Indignantly she responds, “Yes there are
more bananas.” When I ask her where they are, she can't tell me,
but there are definitely more bananas somewhere.
Within
a few minutes, having finally come to terms with the disappointing
banana shortage, she pouts, says, “Logan ate mine!” and storms
out of the room.
Logan
didn't eat hers. Just for the record.
Book Mania
I have a theory (you'll hear me say this often, usually
immediately proceeding something insanely asinine, but no matter)
that beyond basic necessary survival instincts, there are a few
other universal character traits that are common to all
babies from birth:
- The ability to love and the desire to be loved.
- Rhythm. I haven't met a baby yet who didn't love a good tune. Any kind of tune. Babies aren't nearly as discriminatory about music genres as us crotchety older folks are. And babies can rock in rhythm to anything. The faster the music plays, the faster the baby rocks. Sometimes mine rock so hard they tip over, but that helps them learn to crawl – and is entirely irrelevant.
- Book Mania.
Symptoms of early stage book mania may
include, but are not limited to:
- an unceasing desire to eat, flip the pages of, and/or stare intently at the pictures in books, magazines, or other printed materials for hours on end
- requesting repeated readings of a favorite or new or conveniently located piece of reading material from a parent, guardian, or random person who may be unknown to the child but who bears even the vaguest resemblance to someone who is known to be literate
- attributing human characteristics to books; for example, a child may feel the desire to be close to his or her books even while he or she is asleep, watching television, eating, or otherwise engaged (i.e. in the bathroom); he or she may also feel a sense of loss when an unexpected separation from a beloved book occurs such as when a book has been so beloved that it has basically been rebound in some combination of super glue, masking, packing, and scotch tape, until one day it inexplicably disappears leaving a helpless mom with not a clue as to its possible whereabouts.... I said Mom has no idea where it could have gone... She's looked everywhere and yet the book is nowhere to be found... Can we just drop it already?... Oh what's that? No one said anything? Well, nevermind then. Moving on.
The most popular
treatment for book mania is parental apathy, but treatment is not
recommended and may be detrimental to a child's future well-being.
My children have
all had extremely advanced cases of book mania for as long as I can
remember. Baby Corinne is still in Stage 1: The book as geometric
chew toy, but we expect somewhat rapid advancement within the next
2-3 years. Logan and Julianne give no indication of entering Stage 5: Recognizing
relatively poor literature, anytime soon, but they can also
tell the gold from the graphite, so to speak.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)